Due to gradually escalating product along with the trademark infringements, defense against intellectual property infringement is more essential than before
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has decided that resale of licences for second hand software is in general possible.
Limited liability companies might be liable for poor investment counseling through a business with the exact same title.
* By judgment of 21.06.2011 AZ: II ZR 262/09 the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) decided concerning the exclusion of a co-partner from a limited partnership.
In its Judgment of the 04.07.2012, the German Federal Finance Court (BFH) determined that the final income taxes to be paid by the legatee, in his quality as universal successor
According to a recent judgment of the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH, II Reference Number 243/11 of the 19.06.2012), the director of a limited company
As per § 25 l of the German Commercial Code (HGB), no corporate successor liabilities are imposed upon the buying successor if the latter is a mere continuation of the predecessor’s corporation name
Due to expanding product and the copyright law infringements, safety measures are more important than ever before
* In case the priority regarding a community trademark over a national trade mark is in debate, then the day of registration is applicable and not the particular time
Inheritance claims may end at the close of the year, as a result of legislation alternation in obedience with the inheritance reform.
If for example, the main priority of a community trademark over a national trade mark is in question
As is documented in a recent decision by the ruling of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH, II ZR 243/11 from the 19.06.2012)
The reiterated warning, in line with the ruling of the Higher Court of Oldenburg (Oberlandesgericht), can be necessary and justified.
Intestacy cases can often be governed by the German as well as the foreign succession laws which can complicate the implementation of the inheritors’ rights and claims
The decision of the German Federal Finance Court (BFH) dated 07/04/2012 (AZ: II R 15/11) evidently stipulated that the income tax debt for the entire 12 month period of the passed-on individual is tax deductible.
Whenever the priority of a community trademark over a nationwide trademark is in doubt, then the day of registration is pertinent and never the exact time
* Contractual commission regulations of trade agents can be void if they are contradictory
The adoption of resolutions by the other partners is necessary to evoke the exclusion of a co-partner from a limited partnership, along with the explanation to the co-partner.
The verdict of the German Federal Finance Court (BFH) of the 04.07.2012 (AZ: II R 15/11) strongly portrayed the point in which the income tax debt for the death year of the departed is actually tax deductible.
* By grant of exclusive rights in favor of a publishing company, a photographer does not lose, in all cases, the right of use for individual photos of a series.
As soon as the principal interest of a typical community trademark over a federal trademark is questioned, then the day of registration is relevant and not the exact time.
The operator of an Internet address has, as a rule, a special interest in the protection of his advertising appearance on the Internet against imitation.
The decision from the German Federal Finance Court (BFH) of the 04.07.2012 (AZ: II R 15/11) evidently stipulated that the income tax debt for the entire 12 month period of the departed is tax deductible.
Along with the explanation to the co-partner, it requires the adoption of resolutions by the other partners to evoke the exclusion of a co-partner from a limited partnership.
Where the priority of the community trademark over a national trademark is in debate, then the day of registration is pertinent and not the exact time.
The verdict of the German Federal Finance Court (BFH) of the 04.07.2012 (AZ: II R 15/11) strongly portrayed the fact that the income tax debt for the death year of the departed is actually tax deductible.
According to a recent judgment by the Federal Court of Justice (BGH, II ZR 243/11 from the 19.06.2012)
Default customers are quite often a factor behind company insolvency, according to statistics.
In the event that the principal interest of any community trademark more than a federal trademark is in question, then the day of registration is relevant but not the exact time.
In certain cases it can happen that multiple written warnings about copyright infringements are issued.
